Sunwarrior Pea Hemp Protein

Fernández
January 14, 2007

In recent days, with the overwhelming arguments against NAFTA constitutional friction and hurt mainly the most vulnerable groups of society, was uncovered that the FTA is not well negotiated by the "dream team" (COMEX dream team ) as journalists want us to believe that conservative media are revealed because the FTA is ratified through thick and thin.

Even advocates of FTAs \u200b\u200baim to get at creating a "necessity" or large emergency, that despite the existence of constitutional friction and loss of sovereignty, is ratified and not "let go the opportunity." Even last week in El Financiero out an article warning that it negotiated in Chapter X of the NAFTA foreign investor privileges, but we must accept it and do not maintain "a rigid and outdated notion of sovereignty," moreover, "we must move towards" a global trends ... model of development based on open trade and investment attraction "That is the view! While it affects the employer tico.

The same people who want the FTA at all costs, turned a blind eye when Oscar Arias said that to avoid chaos and anarchy, he would promote "democratic tyranny" or against the order of the Board Constitutional on re-election, when the competent body to change the Constitution should be the Legislature. Is it then also it was a "state of necessity or emergency?

Recently a group of lawyers at the highest level, clearly pointed out the mistakes of NAFTA. With customary arrogance editorial, pull chest to disqualify the "Legal Shock Front," trying to discredit and label it "low charge" because if the Constitutional Court thoroughly reviewed the process of the FTA and discover some "errorcitos" NAFTA could fall, which they said would be a catastrophe for the country, similar to what they told us 7 years ago if the combo does not pass and 4 if the Fiscal Plan was not approved, remember?

To this we add the position of the Democratic majority in the United States in the Senate led by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi Congress, who besides being contrary to free trade agreements have proposed this week in relation to Ecuador, which refuses to sign the FTA, trade preferences are undefined. We knew

Initiative Caribbean Basin was not in danger although we wanted to scare with that, when it is actually more dangerous to ratify the FTA. The question is, now, how going out to frighten those who want TLC to troche, Moche and late night?

The risk is to ratify the FTA because we impose a model that excludes the majority, tends to concentrate wealth and it would have to forego the benefits of the Caribbean Basin, which really are not in danger of being lost.

If we reject the FTA, we will continue to grow, because a more equitable country, who cares more for its people and not worry about maintaining a social welfare state will have better educational opportunities, employment, health without abusive patents and especially food safety . Last year, Costa Rica was the Central American country reached the highest percentage growth. (See Report of the ECLAC)

decide the kind of country we want no foreign impositions or responding to a few vested interests in collusion with transnational corporations dark, is sovereignty. Although for some is an outdated concept.